Caltex submission to The Treasury on
exposure draft of the Competition and Consumer Amendment Bill
(No.1)
January 14, 2011
- If legislation is pursued, it should be applied generally to
business, not just banking, and the following changes should be
made:
o
remove the "private price
disclosure" provision, so that both private and public disclosures
are subject to the anti-competitive purpose test (ie "substantial
lessening of competition")
o
limit the price disclosure
provision to information related to future prices, not historical
prices, and not prices which are already in the public domain
o
remove provisions on
disclosure of supply/acquisition capacity or commercial
strategy.
- If the legislation is applied on a sector by sector basis,
clear criteria and consultative processes should be established and
applied before regulation is applied more widely. The Government
has undertaken to regulate only "after further review and detailed
consideration" and "where there is strong evidence" that
anti-competitive behaviours exist.
- While the ACCC has not made any public case for regulation of
petrol retailing and Caltex does not believe such a case can be
made.
- Caltex rejects the assertion that retailers engage in "price
signalling" through Informed Sources Pty Ltd.
The purpose of the disclosure of information to Informed Sources is
to enable public price information to be efficiently collated so
that Caltex is better able to remain competitive on price including
the provision of further discounts.
- In Caltex's view, petrol price cycles are indicative of strong
competition and motorists benefit. Price cycles
enable more price-sensitive motorists to purchase petrol at heavily
discounted prices by observation of past price cycles, which
provides a good guide to when price cycles are likely to occur in
the future.
- If petrol retailing (or the oil industry generally) were
regulated, there would be a number of impacts:
o
the disclosure of pricing
information to Informed Sources would be prohibited even though the
information does not relate to future prices and is publicly
available, for example on price boards
o
there is some risk the
changes could eliminate or modify the price discount cycle to the
detriment of consumers, which would deprive many motorists of the
opportunity of buying petrol at a deep discount and could increase
the average price level by reducing competition
o
if retailers had to use manual observation of price boards
to collect competitive price information, the industry-wide cost to
consumers could be of the order of $40 million per year.
- Regulation would have serious impacts on commercial
arrangements that are not anti-competitive and have a legitimate
business purpose:
o
provision of pricing
information by franchisees to Caltex (a retail competitor and fuel
wholesale) to enable provision of rebates on the wholesale price
would be prohibited
o
provision of competitor
price information by Caltex commission agents to Caltex central
pricing managers would be prohibited if the
commission agent was also an independent operator at another
competing site or was considered a "potential competitor"
o
Caltex offers a range of
fuel cards such as "StarCard" - transmission to Caltex of the card
sale and the transaction sale price risks contravening the private
price disclosure provisions.
- There would be impacts on public pricing information:
o
MotorMouth (part of the
Informed Sources group), which provides information online to the
public on fuel prices might not be viable if fuel retailers ceased
providing electronic data to Informed Sources, because the cost of
independent data collection would be too high
o
myPriceboard allows fuel
retailers to upload data on board prices to post on
MotorMouth myPriceboard would not be viable
without MotorMouth as a means of posting information.
o
Information on historical
prices is provided to the Australian Institute of Petroleum (AIP)
and its consultants for public reporting
purposes. AIP members would not share historical
price information if there was a risk that the information would be
passed on privately to competitors.